Author: Tanisha Ghosh

Full Coverage or False Promises? Inside Health Care Sharing Ministries

The front page of Samaritan Ministries’ website touts a reliable, Christian way to cover healthcare costs; a “… Biblical, non-insurance approach to health care,” if you will.  Users are given the impression that like health insurers, organizations like Samaritan will cover their basic healthcare costs; such as primary care, childbirth, prescription medicines, or emergency care. Upon first glance, the list of plans of different tiers with monthly prices listed against a backdrop of pastels make the website seem no different than any other health insurance company’s website. It bears a striking resemblance to websites for companies such as Aetna or United Healthcare. What this carefully curated image won’t reveal is a growing string of lawsuits, unpaid bills, and heartache

Health Care Sharing Ministries (HCSMs) are defined as, “…a form of health coverage in which members, who typically share a religious belief, make monthly payments to cover expenses of other members.” An August 2018 report from the Commonwealth Fund revealed that HCSMs do not include basic protections under the Affordable Care Act. These organizations do not offer coverage for pre-existing conditions, can charge higher rates based on health status, and may exclude essential health benefits. They may also decline to cover benefits without dollar caps on health care services, or fail to cap out-of-pocket costs to members. 

The lack of monitoring of HSCM activities has been drawing increasing attention from regulators and lawmakers. Most notably in 2024, the co-founders of Missouri-based Medical Cost Sharing, another HCSM, plead guilty to an $8 million wire fraud conspiracy in the Western District of Missouri. James McGinnis and Craig Anthony Reynolds collected $8 million in revenue and used only 3.1% of this amount to pay health care claims. Similarly, in 2023, an Atlanta-based health care sharing ministry called Trinity run by a company called Aliera declared bankruptcy, leaving behind $660 million in unpaid medical claims. Aliera is suing former CEO Shelley Steele for loans she received from the company and never repaid, including one loan of over $6 million. Liberty HealthShare, based out of Ohio, used $140 million of the $300 million they received in member fees to fund a boutique airline, a marijuana farm, buy real estate, and carpet stores; all while their health sharing subsidiaries Cost Sharing Solutions and Medical Cost Solutions LLC went bankrupt. 

In response to the ongoing cases of fraud and lack of regulations, states like Oregon and Washington State are stepping up to protect consumers from incurring crippling debt and hardship. Oregon Democrats introduced HB 2268 in 2025 which would require any individual or organization marketing or selling a health care cost sharing arrangement to register with the Oregon Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services. The office of Washington State Insurance Commissioner (OIC) Patty Kuderer fined ClearShare Health $275,000 in 2025 for selling insurance plans, disguised as “memberships,” without permission from the OIC and using only $54,201 of the $524,095 they collected in fees between 2022 and 2024 to pay their members’ medical expenses. 

Unfortunately, with the extreme cost of healthcare, severe cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, and a myriad of misinformation, consumers may continue turning to health care sharing ministries to help cover the cost of healthcare. In spite of the widespread documented cases of fraud, both the previous and current Trump Administrations have shown support for healthcare sharing ministries. The current Trump Administration plans to ensure tax parity for healthcare sharing ministries as part of their larger plan to lower healthcare costs by deregulating the health insurance industry, Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal programs. These changes would impact more than 1.5 million Americans who are members of a health care sharing ministry.  

Consumers looking to save on health insurance or who do not believe that health insurance or federal programs align with their values, should think twice before purchasing a membership from a health care sharing ministry. With the federal government’s support of health care sharing ministries, it is up to state regulators to protect consumers. Increasing supervision of healthcare sharing ministries and imposing long overdue penalties on those engaged in fraudulent practices is long overdue. For an industry that has promised those in need so much, they have left thousands with even more debt, grief, and regret than before. 

Destination Unknown: Navigating Abortion Training in Post-Dobbs America

Abortion is not only common but an essential component of comprehensive care, with one in four pregnant people accessing abortion care in the United States. During my annual physical this summer, I reflected on what challenges people seeking abortion care in my home state of Georgia – and across the Southeast – now face. As the conversation drifted from lab results to my research in reproductive rights law, my doctor posed a question I hadn’t considered: What happens if the next generation of physicians is denied the right to train in abortion care?

On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health signaled a seismic shift in reproductive care, affecting not only patients, but physicians in training. The fight to preserve abortion care has moved far beyond the operating room, and now extends to fellowship and residency programs, where trainees do not know if they will ever receive abortion care experience. In a nation where abortion is no longer a constitutional right, medical students, residents, and fellows in states with restrictive abortion laws are being forced to seek training across state lines, and even abroad. One fourth-year medical student planning to pursue a specialty involving family planning, was forced to independently find a rotation that would provide abortion care training, and had to travel as far as London after her school’s reproductive health clinic shut down. 

Training in abortion care for medical students and resident physicians already had significant limitations pre-Dobbs in states with restrictive abortion laws. Along with barriers associated with geographic location or having the resources to travel, patients must now face the additional challenge of finding a physician with enough training to provide an abortion.

Critics of widespread access to abortion care often argue that medical exception laws are enough to prevent maternal mortality or morbidity. However, these “exceptions,” often written into law by people without medical training, using nonmedical language, have resulted in mass confusion for clinicians who, when faced with split-second decisions, are forced to deny or delay care for their patients. Post-Dobbs, there is scant opportunity for doctors in training to have hands-on abortion care experience in states that operate on medical exception laws.

Within Family Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, some family planning program directors have already expressed concerns about the ability to attract residents and fellows to programs in states with abortion bans. These concerns are not without basis, with a cross-sectional study of 2,436 OB-GYN residency programs revealing a small but significant decrease in the number of applicants to residency programs in states with strict abortion laws. According to the study, state-specific abortion restrictions are impacting the training of around 44% of OB-Gyn residents in the U.S. Even though OB-GYN residency programs were also completely full in 2023, there was a statistically significant decrease in applications compared to 2022, and years pre-Dobbs.

While the long-term on the OB-GYN workforce may not be visible just yet three years out from the Dobbs decision, should the trend continue, maternal mortality and morbidity may rise, especially in maternal care deserts. Maternal care deserts are defined as counties where hospitals lack obstetric services, birth centers, obstetricians, gynecologists, or certified nurse-midwives. Maternal care deserts are often found in rural areas, with most rural countries having maternal mortality rates close to two times higher than rates in urban counties.

The future of abortion care training in OB-Gyn and Family Medicine residency programs in states with restrictions is uncertain, with no clear path forward. While some states with restrictive laws may offer medical exceptions, these may not provide enough opportunities for medical students and residents to gain enough training to confidently perform these procedures, impacting the standard of care nationwide.