Tag: insurance

The Affordable Care Act’s Impact in Reducing the Uninsured Rate in America & the Upcoming Health Insurance Cliff

In March 2010, President Barack Obama signed the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act, commonly known as the ACA or Obamacare, into law. One of the legislation’s main goals was to reduce the number of Americans lacking health insurance coverage. Between the law’s passage in 2010 and 2023, the number of uninsured Americans fell from 46.5 million to 25.3 million.

The ACA sought to increase health insurance coverage for Americans through two main mechanisms: Medicaid expansion and subsidies for Americans to buy insurance through the health insurance marketplaces administered by the federal government and many states. The ACA sought to expand the number of adults under the age of 65 eligible for Medicaid, a jointly funded federal and state program, which traditionally provided coverage to the lowest income Americans. Specifically, the maximum income eligibility threshold for most Medicaid members effectively increased from 100 to 138% of the federal poverty level. However, the Supreme Court, in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, ruled that states could choose whether to expand Medicaid in their states. As of 2025, 10 states, including populous states such as Texas and Florida, have still not expanded Medicaid.

For Americans ineligible for Medicaid and earning less than 400% of the federal poverty level annually, the Affordable Care Act provides subsidies in the form of a tax credit, the Advanced Premium Tax Credit (APTC), to help people afford their health insurance premiums. By 2019, the number of uninsured Americans had fallen to 28.9 million.

In 2021, President Joe Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) into law. The legislation provided enhanced subsidies, known as the Enhanced Premium Tax Credit (EPTC), which expanded assistance to Americans seeking to purchase health insurance through the ACA marketplaces. Specifically, ARPA removed the cap on premium tax credits for those making more than 400% of the federal poverty level, providing subsidies for middle-income Americans for the first time. The EPTCs have been successful in increasing health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplaces, as a record 21 million Americans purchased insurance coverage through the marketplace in 2024. Bolstered by these subsidies, a low unemployment rate, and pandemic-era policies protecting Medicaid coverage, the nation’s uninsured rate reached a record low 7.9% in early 2023.

The EPTCs are currently set to expire at the end of 2025, as they were not extended in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed into law by President Donald Trump in July. In fact, the EPTCs have become more important in the health safety net because of the impact of the One Beautiful Bill Act’s cuts to Medicaid and other assistance for low- and middle-income Americans, which are estimated by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to increase the number of uninsured Americans by 10 million through 2034. The CBO also predicts that the expiration of the EPTCs would increase the number of uninsured Americans by an additional 3.8 million people by 2034, with 2 million Americans losing their insurance next year alone.

For Americans able to still afford their health insurance coverage, their premiums may skyrocket. According to a 2024 analysis, EPTCs saved the average subsidized health insurance plan enrollee more than $700 on their monthly premium. In anticipation of the expiration of these enhanced subsidies, insurers on the ACA marketplace are raising premiums by roughly 20% for 2026.

Health insurance coverage is important for two main reasons. First, it allows Americans to utilize health care services without paying exorbitant out of pocket costs. Secondly, the reimbursement hospitals and other health care facilities receive from insurance companies for services provided to insured patients provide needed financial support to help allow these facilities to stay open. In an time with rising economic headwinds for both Americans and for health care providers, a rise in the health uninsurance rate caused by the expiration of the Enhanced Premium Tax Credits would add to economic challenges faced by patients and health care providers alike.

Breast Pumps For All, But Not Necessarily The Best

The ACA requires insurance companies to provide new mothers with breast pumps and other equipment that is necessary to help them breast feed.

Unfortunately, the law doesn’t specify the type or quality of the breast pumps to be provided, so the companies (with doctors’ recommendations) get to decide. This issue leads to whether a company will provide a manual or an electric pump.

The benefits of an electric pump over a manual pump are several: they’re high-powered and can simulate a nursing child, while manual pumps can be weak, clumsy, and cumbersome for a working mother to use. They take more time to pump than an electrical pump.

The costs are also considerably different, when a high-end electric pump coming in at around $300, and a manual pump costing as little as $35.

Anti-Trans Insurance Policies Banned in Oregon

It was announced on December 19, 2012 by the Oregon Insurance Division of the Department of Consumer and Business Services that private health insurance companies could no longer discriminate against trans policy holders.

Transgender advocates have been lauding the regulations, which prohibit denying coverage of hormone therapy, hysterectomies, mastectomies, and other medically-necessary treatments for gender dysphoria and sex-reassignment surgery. Even though many of these surgeries are already protected for non-trans policy holders, the law now specifically prohibits denying coverage for a surgery because the recipient is trans. The regulations also expand mental health services to include trans policy holders.

Being transgender is considered a mental health disorder known as Gender Identity Disorder in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) – a highly controversial decision. On December 2, 2012, the APA announced that it would be removing Gender Identity Disorder from DSM-V and replacing it with Gender Dysphoria. The difference is that GID focuses on whether a person feels their birth sex and gender are in alignment, and GD focuses on the anguish caused by being unable to make the alignment between sex and gender. For example, a person who might be diagnosed with GID doesn’t necessarily suffer from dysphoria if they have access to gender reassignment surgery, but a person who might be diagnosed with GID could suffer dysphoria if they’re prevented from getting medical treatments and surgeries to change their sex to suit their gender.

In the US, payment for health care treatment by insurance companies, Medicare, and Medicaid relies on the diagnosis of a specific disorder categorized in the DSM-IV. Some say the “disorder” should be struck because it inappropriately stigmatizes trans identities, much like homosexuality was until 1973, and some say it’s necessary in order for trans people to receive the health care they need, such as gender reassignment surgery. The American Psychological Association seems to agree that it is not being trans that causes the requisite distress or disability that qualifies a psychological state as a disorder, but rather the social stigma, discrimination, violence, and difficulty obtaining access to health care that trans people face.

For more information on what being trans means, you can visit the APA’s website on sexuality and gender identification.